On Mar 15, 2007, at 6:08 PM, TRANS wrote:
> I would like to propose that the Multiton pattern be supported in
> Ruby's standard library.

Is 'multiton' really the right name for this?  I've used a pattern  
much like this in different contexts, but would usually describe such  
objects as 'immutable'.  If I can ask, what practical use cases did  
you have in mind for this?

Tom