Issue #17849 has been updated by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).


@mame How do you explain the test I linked above fails (still does with latest CRuby) then?
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/17849#note-16

Anyway, we all agree nobody should rely on that, and it's also unrealistic to ask people to explicitly add `Thread.handle_interrupt` in every `ensure`.

----------------------------------------
Feature #17849: Fix Timeout.timeout so that it can be used in threaded Web servers
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/17849#change-94516

* Author: duerst (Martin Drst)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
----------------------------------------
Making this a separate issue from #17837

Eregon (Benoit Daloze) wrote in https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/17837#note-10 (which is  about timeouts for regular expressions):

> I think fixing Timeout.timeout might be possible.
> The main/major issue is it can trigger within `ensure`, right? Is there anything else?
> We could automatically mask `Thread#raise` within `ensure` so it only happens after the `ensure` body completes.
> And we could still have a larger "hard timeout" if an `ensure` takes way too long (shouldn't happen, but one cannot be sure).
> I recall discussing this with @schneems some time ago on Twitter.





-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request / ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>