Issue #17399 has been updated by zverok (Victor Shepelev).


@mame My concern is not "we should warn" (or "we shouldn't warn") about experimental features, but about consistency. It seems that since 2.7, when warning categories and first experimental warnings were introduced, it became an ad-hoc rule to match "experimentalness" in docs with the warning.

I am OK with a warning (especially considering it is tunable); I'd be OK with the new decision "warnings were not necessary, actually". What bothers me is inconsistency.

----------------------------------------
Misc #17399: Are endless methods experimental?
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/17399#change-89423

* Author: zverok (Victor Shepelev)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
----------------------------------------
They are marked as such in NEWS, but an attempt to define one doesn't produce a warning (unlike other features marked this way, like one-line pattern-matching or find patterns)



-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request / ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>