On 1/30/07, Eustaquio Rangel de Oliveira Jr. <eustaquiorangel / yahoo.com> wrote:

> I was checking some CLR opinions and - correct me please if I'm wrong - seems
> that there were some trouble with continuations. Is just a happy coincidence the
> Matz's plans to remove continuations from 1.9.x?

As far as I understood it, a big reason for removing contiuations is
because they were hard to implement on (certain?) virtual machines.
It's sad, and wrong in my opinion, that they're being removed.  They
don't enjoy much use, but they do allow for some funky stuff.

  nikolai