On 1/28/07, Patrick Hurley <phurley / gmail.com> wrote:
> On 1/28/07, Nikolai Weibull <now / bitwi.se> wrote:
> > On 1/28/07, John Lam (CLR) <jflam / microsoft.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I'm also new to Microsoft, so I'm
> > > learning a lot about the rules of engagement here, so please forgive me if
> > > you find some of my proposals to be a big ? strange.
> >
> > ?  Ruby's not being developed by Microsoft, so why would their "rules
> > of engagement" matter here?
>
> If Microsoft wants to pay a smart (and nice) guy like John to work on
> a Ruby spec, and that is the list of conditions (which sounds
> completely reasonable to me). I am all for it.

I'm obviously a stupid (and unpleasant) guy unlike John, but what list
of conditions?

I was just wondering what he was trying to say.

  nikolai