On 1/28/07, Nikolai Weibull <now / bitwi.se> wrote:
> On 1/28/07, John Lam (CLR) <jflam / microsoft.com> wrote:
>
> > I'm also new to Microsoft, so I'm
> > learning a lot about the rules of engagement here, so please forgive me if
> > you find some of my proposals to be a big ? strange.
>
> ?  Ruby's not being developed by Microsoft, so why would their "rules
> of engagement" matter here?

If Microsoft wants to pay a smart (and nice) guy like John to work on
a Ruby spec, and that is the list of conditions (which sounds
completely reasonable to me). I am all for it.

pth