To go with the p names, I was thinking personal. The methods we're  
talking about certainly are the personal property of the class that  
defines them.

  - Evan

On Jan 24, 2007, at 7:29 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

> Hi,
>
> In message "Re: new method dispatch rule (matz' proposal)"
>     on Thu, 25 Jan 2007 10:30:47 +0900, Shugo Maeda <shugo@ruby- 
> lang.org> writes:
>
> |How about `internal' or `sealed'?
> |They are taken from .NET (but have different meaning:().
>
> Others suggested 'final'.  But if we adapt rule 4 without rule 3,
> it is impossible to leave private as it is.
>
> 							matz.
>