On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 07:38:27AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> In message "Re: new method dispatch rule (matz' proposal)"
>     on Wed, 24 Jan 2007 00:22:45 +0900, Shugo Maeda <shugo / ruby-lang.org> writes:
> 
> |I think it's better to keep private for that purpose.  How about to
> |introduce a new visibility for unoverridable methods instead?
> 
> If compatibility weigh most.  Adding more visibility may cause
> confusion unless we have VERY good name for it.  Suggestion, anyone?

To keep the 'p' theme going: petrified ;)

marcel
-- 
Marcel Molina Jr. <marcel / vernix.org>