```Issue #17170 has been updated by shyouhei (Shyouhei Urabe).

Status changed from Open to Feedback

```ruby
% rbenv exec irb
irb(main):001:0> require 'bigdecimal'
=> true
irb(main):002:0> require 'bigdecimal/util'
=> true
irb(main):003:0> require 'complex'
=> false
irb(main):004:0> 0.to_i
=> 0
irb(main):005:0> 0.to_f
=> 0.0
irb(main):006:0> 0.to_r
=> (0/1)
irb(main):007:0> 0.to_c
=> (0+0i)
irb(main):008:0> 0.to_d
=> 0.0
irb(main):009:0> 0.to_d.class
=> BigDecimal
irb(main):010:0>
```

Do these methods work for you?  They need no braces.

----------------------------------------
Feature #17170: Numeric.zero, Numeric.one
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/17170#change-87572

* Author: foonlyboy (Eike Dierks)
* Status: Feedback
* Priority: Normal
----------------------------------------
Hi at the ruby team,

I'd like to suggest to enhance Numeric
to provide two new class methods,
which shall be: zero and one

- Integer.zero shall be equal to Integer(0)
- Float.zero shall be equal to Float(0)
- BigDecimal.zero shall be equal to BigDecimal(0)
- Complex.zero shall be equal to Complex(0)

Likewise for one, you get the idea.

so Numeric.zero.zero? shall always be true.

I expect this to make code more explicit.
And it would safe a pair of braces.
(don't laugh -- this really got me here)

---

Maybe you already considered that for 3.0,
that would be a late addition.

ruby shines in teaching mathematics.
you know, we have zero and one there.

I use ruby in the financial realm.
For me it's important to write BigDecimal.zero

---

I expect that the new api should not break existing code.
We could try it with rails first,

It would be nice to have that in rails 3.

~eike

--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request / ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>
```